Why Affiliates Make The Worst Entrepreneurs
shoemoney
·
·
5 min read
TaeWoo wrote an article on Why Affiliates Make The Best Entrepreneurs. And I agree with a majority of the arguments, as I probably fall into every thing he said about what makes (good) affiliates into (good) entrepreneurs.
But dealing with affiliates the past several years of my life, I've also noticed that there are some patterns I see now that I'm starting my own SaaS business (PAR program), that would make affiliate marketers horrible choices for entrepreneurs (especially if I was an investor and I was looking for companies started by seasoned marketers).
These, by the way, are generalizations and by no means applicable to every affiliate on the planet.
The name of the game is ROI. If there is no return, these affiliates won't stick around.
There's a problem with this attitude. Most successful businesses at their humble beginnings had little or zero revenue. PAR program, for example, was a huge financial sink hole for me in the beginning because I was spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on research & development that no normal affiliate would ever take on.
Affiliates want immediate return and immediate results. Even if they did, they would often look for the best "bang" for the buck. Make $10k/mo. on some software you wrote? I know some super affiliates that would just sell it for some small multiple and move on, even though their investment could've yielded 1000x return if they were to take it to the next level.
I don't know if this is a good or bad thing, but this "make-money-now mentality" that's going around entrepreneurs (i.e. "lean startup") isn't something that may be the best for human kind. Imagine if all entrepreneurs followed this mantra. Companies that solve real deep shitty problems like cancer (i.e. pharmaceutical), global warming (i.e. renewable energies), sustainable food supply (i.e. agricultural engineering)... would NEVER exist. Some of these companies are nothing but financial sinkholes in the beginning, and highly risky.
If all you focused on was whether or not your idea was profitable from day 1, you wouldn't swing for home runs... you'd swing for 1st base hits.
1) Greedy little bastards
The name of the game is ROI. If there is no return, these affiliates won't stick around.
There's a problem with this attitude. Most successful businesses at their humble beginnings had little or zero revenue. PAR program, for example, was a huge financial sink hole for me in the beginning because I was spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on research & development that no normal affiliate would ever take on.
Affiliates want immediate return and immediate results. Even if they did, they would often look for the best "bang" for the buck. Make $10k/mo. on some software you wrote? I know some super affiliates that would just sell it for some small multiple and move on, even though their investment could've yielded 1000x return if they were to take it to the next level.
I don't know if this is a good or bad thing, but this "make-money-now mentality" that's going around entrepreneurs (i.e. "lean startup") isn't something that may be the best for human kind. Imagine if all entrepreneurs followed this mantra. Companies that solve real deep shitty problems like cancer (i.e. pharmaceutical), global warming (i.e. renewable energies), sustainable food supply (i.e. agricultural engineering)... would NEVER exist. Some of these companies are nothing but financial sinkholes in the beginning, and highly risky.
If all you focused on was whether or not your idea was profitable from day 1, you wouldn't swing for home runs... you'd swing for 1st base hits.